If you’ve ever been arrested on suspicion of drink or drug driving and asked to provide a blood or urine sample, there’s a vital legal safeguard you might not even know about: your right to request and receive your own specimen for independent analysis.
It’s a small detail, but one that can make or break a prosecution.
Under section 15(5) of the Road Traffic Offenders’ Act 1988, the law sets out a mandatory right for the accused as follows:
(5) Where, at the time a specimen of blood or urine was provided by the accused, he asked to be provided with such a specimen, evidence of the proportion of alcohol or any drug found in the specimen is not admissible on behalf of the prosecution unless—
(a) the specimen in which the alcohol or drug was found is one of two parts into which the specimen provided by the accused was divided at the time it was provided, and
(b) the other part was supplied to the accused.
(5A) Where a specimen of blood was taken from the accused under section 7A of the Road Traffic Act 1988, evidence of the proportion of alcohol or any drug found in the specimen is not admissible on behalf of the prosecution unless—
(a) the specimen in which the alcohol or drug was found is one of two parts into which the specimen taken from the accused was divided at the time it was taken; and
(b) any request to be supplied with the other part which was made by the accused at the time when he gave his permission for a laboratory test of the specimen was complied with.
In simpler terms, the evidence of your alcohol or drug measurement in blood or urine cannot be used against you if you requested your own sample at the time of giving it, and this was not provided to you.
The law contains this clear right as it is recognised that if you’re facing prosecution based on a single lab report, you should have the chance to independently verify the analysis. Without this right being met, your ability to challenge the evidence is seriously compromised.
We’ve dealt with numerous cases where this exact issue became the central battleground in court.
The court found our client NOT GUILTY on this basis alone.
Courts have consistently held that if the statutory process isn’t followed to the letter, the prosecution may not be able to rely on the lab results at all. There are several leading cases on this point:
In Dear v DPP, the High Court ruled that unless the accused is actually given their own part of the sample, the prosecution evidence is inadmissible.
Similarly, in the case of Sharp, the Court of Appeal made clear that the specimen doesn’t have to be handed over on the spot, but it must be supplied within a reasonable time, and in a condition that allows independent testing.
What counts as a reasonable time will depend on the context but if a defendant is in shock, injured, or simply unable to take their sample home, the onus is still on the police to ensure their rights are preserved.
If you asked for your own sample and didn’t receive it, or if you were misled about its availability or suitability, that may give rise to a legal defence. We’ve successfully argued for charges to be thrown out on this very basis.
Even where the sample was technically offered, cases like Perry v McGovern and DPP v Snook show that any confusion, poor handling, or misleading information from police can render the whole process unfair and ultimately lead to acquittals.
Too often, people accused of drink or drug driving assume the test result is the end of the story. At Geoffrey Miller Solicitors, we know that the legal details matter. From the way samples are handled to whether your rights were respected, we scrutinise every step.
If you’re facing prosecution, don’t assume the evidence is watertight — we’ve built our reputation on showing that it often isn’t.
Facing a charge of excess alcohol or drug driving?Let’s talk.
The sooner we’re involved, the sooner we can safeguard your rights
Geoffrey Miller Solicitors are specialists defending drivers nationwide for all types of driving offences. Call our team of expert driving offence solicitors for some free initial advice.
You can also book an appointment with Jeanette Miller a.k.a. Miss Justice using our online booking system. If Jeanette is unavailable for your preferred date and time you can book an appointment with a member of our legal team. Please have as much information about your enquiry before the call e.g. Date of Hearing, Paperwork etc.
Dr Joelle Grogan from The Law Show interviews Jeanette Miller on BBC Sounds to ask if its legal to drive
Watch our latest interview between Jeanette Miller and FCA expert, Clementine (Clemmie) Bowyer Director at Effecta Compliance Limited. Clients
Jeanette Miller talks about the DVLA delays in processing driving licence applications on Watchdog on the One Show. The Driver and Vehicle Licencing
Jeanette Miller talks to BBC Breakfast News regarding motorists still driving with 12 or more points on their licence due to exceptional hardship.
Jeanette Miller talks live on the #BBCBreakfast couch about those pesky parking notices! The Ombudsman says appeals process is unclear and looks like
New drug driving laws will come into effect on March 2nd 2015. Jeanette Miller aka “Miss Justice” talks to BBC Breakfast about the new
Jeanette Miller talks to BBC Breakfast about private car parks charges and the current RAC report. Jeanette states that 45% of appeals was won in
Managing Director, Jeanette Miller appeared on BBC’s Panorama discussing traffic
Were Eric Pickles’ proposals to relax parking rules, simply political spin or are they workable sensible suggestions?! Motoring expert,
Jeanette Miller of Geoffrey Miller Solicitors appeared on BBC Breakfast News on 26th December discussing the proposed changes to drink drive laws in
Geoffrey Miller Solicitors are specialists defending drivers nationwide for drink driving offences, drug driving offences, dangerous driving,
Leading motoring law solicitor, Jeanette Miller from Geoffrey Miller Solicitors discusses why many drivers continue to drive while using a mobile
Jeanette Miller talks to BBC Radio Essex about car number plate cloning which is on the rise with 12,300 instances between Jan 2021 and Sept
Jeanette Miller is interviewed on LBC Radio discussing penalty points you can receive for not wearing a
Are we going to be ready for self-driving cars by the end of the year? Jeanette Miller talks to LBC Radio about self driving cars which could be
MD Jeanette Miller talks to Nick Ferrari on LBC Radio about the government consultation to introduce Automated Lane Keeping System (ALKS) technology
Jeanette Miller talks to BBC Radio Wales about what should the punishment be for motorist who speed excessively and should the law for speeding be
BBC Radio Kent interview with Jeanette Miller to discuss the drink driving limit and education towards drinking and
Britain’s road policing chief says you should be punished if you break the speed limit by just one mile per hour. Jeanette discusses the potential
Listen to Managing Director, Jeanette Miller, discussing the war between motorists and cyclists on BBC Three
Jeanette Miller is interviewed by BBC Surrey and talks about drink driving and should the drink driving limit be lowered or even to zero. Campaigns
Jeanette Miller talks to BBC Three Counties Radio station about parking fines. The local government Ombudsman says that local councils are hitting
Jeanette Miller aka “Miss Justice” talks to BBC Radio Wales regarding if the festival goers are entitled to any compensation. Hundreds of
Jeanette Miller talks about accidents and near misses caused by being distracted at the wheel by technology. Cars today have more modern gadgets such
Add comment